David "Markets Are Conversations" Weinberger offers this reminder to the word-of-mouth marketing industry: "Marketing has to change. It has to recognize that market conversations
are now the best source of information about companies and their
products and services. It has to recognize that those conversations are
not themselves marketing — you and me talking about whether we like our
new digital cameras is not you and me marketing to each another.
Neither is our conversation a "marketing opportunity." But the
temptation to see it as such is well nigh impossible for most marketers
to resist."





James
I am not so sure that I entirely agree with Weinberger.
If the purpose of marketing is to influence somebody to do something different, then having a conversation with friends or family is indeed peer-to-peer marketing.
Of course, marketers do not have any control over these conversations, (just as they don't typically have all that much control over the experience of using the products that are being talked about).
I suspect that it is the perceived level of control that ultimately should separate in-control marketing from out-of-control conversations.
He is right about the implications for marketers trying to influence conversations though.
Graham Hill
Independent Marketing Consultant
Interim Marketing Manager
Posted by: Graham Hill | August 12, 2007 at 02:36 PM
Fair point Graham, it's a sensitive area however and easy to create problems if handled too blatantly.
Posted by: James Cherkoff | August 12, 2007 at 04:04 PM
"We need to help marketers resist their deeply bred urges."
Ha-ha. Good one!
Is it marketing if you aren't getting paid to talk?
Is it marketing if you don't have a product to sell? Is it marketing if you are 'selling' an idea, like anti-consumerism for example?
Is anti-marketing marketing? (Ex. you have a blog promoting the idea that people should avoid 'product X' because it's terrible. Is that marketing?)
Or alternatively, are fans of a product really unpaid marketers?
Some of those questions seem more fundamental than whether a conversation is marketing.
In the future, everything everywhere will be marketing and everyone will be a marketer -- except professional marketers. (They will get squeezed out by user-generated marketing. Incidentally, what do you think about the inclusion of one-click Google AdSense in iWeb, Apple's application for creating a personal web presence?)
Posted by: brad | August 13, 2007 at 10:57 AM
Thanks Brad, insightful as ever. I'll take a looksy at iWeb...sounds like click-fraud heaven to me!
Posted by: James Cherkoff | August 13, 2007 at 11:17 AM
interesting post and comments!
isn't there a distinction between the desire to influence/affect the other party in the conversation, compared to the desire for a specific outcome to happen?
surely marketing is more about the latter (ultimately, a specific outcome vis a vis the brand/product)?
ergo, markets may be conversations ... but conversations are not marketing!
Posted by: kevin | September 05, 2007 at 09:25 PM
Thanks Kevin, as marketeers we are all trying to set the new boundaries correctly but as consumers we are immediately aware when they are wrong...
Posted by: James Cherkoff | September 06, 2007 at 11:42 AM